The Arguments on Free Trade

Depending on who you speak with, the idea of free trade is highly controversial. Some believe that the practice increases inequality and affords corporations too much leverage and power over the economy, while others feel that free trade brings opportunity and development to poorer countries, making everyone richer. The general premise of free trade is that there should be few limitations and restrictions on trade between countries. While it sounds easy enough, the existence of free trade is actually a complex structure of quotas, tax impositions, and product restrictions. When people advocate for the idea of free trade, they are actually speaking to even greater removal of some of the established restrictions. As a general observation, there are some countries better at producing certain goods than others, and rather than countries laboring to produce the entire line of products required for their citizens, it is easier to focus on doing one thing well and sourcing the remaining items from another country. This makes for less wasted resources and time, while still providing enough goods to meet with local or global demand.

Managing the Global Market

The restrictions on free trade are sometimes considered free trade agreements, as these are the treaties used by countries to regulate the duties, taxes, and tariffs for all imports and exports. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is one of the more well-know treaties long-held by the United States. The perspective on these agreements has both positive and negative arguments when considering the effects on living standards, business growth, and job creations. Because these trade agreements are supposed to increase trading opportunities between countries, there are several advantages to an increase in international trade.

Boosting the Local Economy

Companies who pursue trade opportunities often see an increase in their country’s economic growth. The estimate for the U.S. is about .5% growth each year as a direct result of NAFTA. The increase in market openings improves the business climate, as there is greater potential for sales and growth. Businesses cannot afford to remain stagnant and creating a monopoly in the local industry, as the global market drives more competitive pricing and provides more competition. In addition, there are many governments across the globe that will subsidize local industry opportunism, but with trade agreements that remove subsidies, government spending is lowered. Smaller companies don’t need to rely as heavily on government assistance, as trade agreements often bring investors to a country and new capital into their local industries. For the U.S., their presence across the globe also brings the U.S. dollar to more isolated economies and improves their financial position. Financial institutions across the globe benefit from improved economies, especially those like the Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry Limited, which has become an industry leader for its consumer-centric banking and digitized trading applications and accessibility.

Improving Local Resources

Local companies experience growth when allowed to compete on the global market, enabling access to the latest in technology and training from their multinational partners. Local economy growth also drives up employment, with investor companies often providing the training to the local labor pool. In turn, global companies often have more expertise in their areas of operations especially with industries like oil drilling, mining, and manufacturing. The local company provides access to the resources while the multinational partner or investor brings training on best practices and lean operations. This can keep prices down for the overall market value, but still provide the best in quality materials.

Negative Opinions

Even though these areas seem highly beneficial to a countries economic health, ultimately benefiting the citizens, there are many who feel that the cons outweigh the pros with free trade. There are three key disadvantages.

  1. Job Outsourcing. The primary complaint of those against free trade is the increased outsourcing that occurs to countries where the cost of living is less. This creates an opening a reduced labor force within the United States, as jobs are sent to countries where labor is cheaper and there are fewer regulations on working conditions. Mexico is often seen as a threat to the American labor force, as the enforcement of NAFTA saw a lot of manufacturing plants closing their doors in favor of imports from south of the border.
  2. Reduced Domestic Industry Opportunity. Traditional economies often rely on the works of small family farms for employment, yet the subsidized agri-business ventures of developed countries put these little guys out of business. In turn, unemployment rates rise, as do the crime, poverty, and mental health concerns.
  3. Theft of Intellectual Property. Many countries do not recognize nor establish their own patent protection laws, and even if they do have them, they aren’t always enforced. This leads to an uptick in the counterfeit and fraudulent knock-off goods that have been manufactured through hacked data and stolen ideas.

Without free trade, the global economy would look much different, ultimately shaping the economy of countries across the world. Trade agreements can benefit local companies and national citizens when the governing bodies are aware of threats, loopholes, and inequalities in the arrangements or financial return.

Editor's choice
Payday Loans For People on Benefits - A Secure Loan Deal
Credit Card Debt Advisor for Daunting Debts
A Complete Guide to Applying For A Credit Card Online
Factors That do Not Impact Your CIBIL Score
Tips on Finding a Debt Recovery Company